URGENT REQUEST FOR ACTION – TO PRESERVE OUR CONSTITUTION

Dear Member of the U.S. Congress;

On January 8th, 2009, you will be meeting in a joint session of Congress in order to perform the final step of COUNTING and CONFIRMING the electoral votes for the President of the United States (POTUS).

This urgent letter is a request by your (and Mr. Obama’s) employers, We The People, for you to submit an OBJECTION to those votes being counted due to the Constitutional INELIGIBILITY of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. to serve as POTUS:

1. No proof that he was born on U.S. sovereign territory, as required by Article II of the U.S. Constitution (the posting of his forged & fraudulent Certification of Live Birth (C.O.L.B.) only proves fraud – and that he’s INELIGIBLE;

2. No proof that he ever applied for U.S. citizenship, when reaching the age of majority, following his years as a citizen of Indonesia (this would make him ‘naturalized’, and therefore INELIGIBLE);

3. No proof that he was born of two parents of U.S. citizenship, with both owing allegiance to and being under the jurisdiction of the U.S., as required by law and/or the Constitution, in order to be a ‘natural-born citizen’. (actually he has freely admitted the opposite to be true, and therefore INELIGIBLE);

4. No proof that he was authorized, as a ‘natural-born U.S. citizen’ with a U.S. Passport, to travel to Pakistan in 1981 (he could not by law), or that he re-applied for ‘naturalized’ U.S. citizenship on his return, which would also make him INELIGIBLE;

5. No certified proof that he registered for the draft/Selective Service between the ages of 18 and 26, as required by law, thereby rendering him ineligible, by law, for employment in the Executive Branch of our government, and therefore INELIGIBLE for POTUS. (NOTE: over a year of multiple FOIA requests produced a forged and blatantly fraudulent Selective Service Registration form that should be cause for indictments and arrests);

6. No proof that he is, in fact, not an illegal alien, and therefore subject to the same penalties that would befall all illegal aliens in his situation. Therefore, INELIGIBLE;

Constructive Knowledge would inform and confirm to all who have examined the facts of this collossal fraud being perpetrated upon We The People of America (see www.DrOrly.Blogspot.com – ‘Open Letter to C.J. Roberts’) that confirming the electoral votes and thereby furthering the act of installing Mr. Obama as POTUS could possibly be construed as failure to honor one’s oath of office.

Therefore, we are calling on you, as a member of Congress, sworn to uphold, protect, and defend that Constitution, to OBJECT to the counting and confirmation of those electoral votes until proof of his eligibility or ineligibility can be determined, and to call for indictments in regard to any and all alleged violations of U.S. laws and one’s sworn oath.

Please let us know if you intend to stand with We The People in this epic battle to defend and preserve our Constitution. Our Nation can survive four years of any President. It cannot survive without a Constitution.

Sincerely;

We The People of the United States of America

Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed

(from America’s Right)

US Supreme Court Decisions Could be Imminent
According to the Docket No. 08-570 at the United States Supreme Court, the Federal Election Commission yesterday filed a waiver of its right to respond to attorney Philip Berg’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 31 and currently pending before the Court.

Contrary to Internet rumor that Justice Souter had ordered Barack Obama to provide the vault copy of his birth certificate, the Court merely set December 1, 2008 as the date by which the respondents–Obama, the Democratic National Committee and Federal Election Commission–were to respond to Berg’s petition if they chose to do so at all. Yesterday’s filing, which appeared on the docket this afternoon, shows that the respondents have waived their right to respond.

It also suggests that a decision on Berg’s petition could be imminent.

There are a number of reasons why the respondents here would choose not to respond. First, because the Court only grants between 70 and 120 of the 8,000 or so petitions it receives every year, perhaps they just liked their odds of Berg’s petition getting denied. Second, because they have made arguments as to Berg’s lack of standing several times at the district court level and beyond, perhaps they felt as though any arguments had already been made and were available on the record. Or, perhaps the waiver shows that the FEC and other respondents do not take seriously the allegations put forth by Berg, and did not wish to legitimize the claims with a response.

Another thing which is not completely clear is whether the FEC is filing for itself or on behalf of all respondents. On the docket, the FEC’s attorney is noted as being the attorney for all respondents; on yesterday’s docket entry, it states that the waiver was filed by “respondents Federal Election Commission, et al.” As it were, the FEC’s attorney, Gregory Garre, is with the Solicitor General’s office, and does not represent Obama or the DNC. While attorneys acting on behalf of a group of defendants or respondents is not necessarily rare, the difference here is the involvement of the Solicitor General’s office, a federal office.

This distinction is not lost on Philip Berg.

“If it were just the FEC filing the waiver, I must say that I’m surprised,” Berg said. “I’m surprised because I think they should take the position that the Supreme Court should grant standing to us. I think they have a responsibility not only to Phil Berg, but to all citizens of this country, to put forth a sense of balance which otherwise doesn’t seem to exist.”

“However, if this was filed by the FEC on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion,” he said, noting that the attorney from the Solicitor General’s office should be representing federal respondents and not the DNC or Obama.

Indeed, neither the DNC nor the president-elect are, for now, federal respondents, though Obama’s status as Illinois senator–a position from which he resigned this past weekend–could place him under the representational umbrella of the Justice Department.

While outright collusion could be a stretch, if indeed the FEC’s attorney is acting on behalf of all respondents and not just the FEC, there certainly is the appearance of coordination. Regardless of the veracity of the allegations put forth against Barack Obama, for the Department of Justice and the Solicitor General of the United States to be facilitating a defense which is calculated to shield from disclosure, rather than compel disclosure, of manifestly relevant and critical information bearing directly upon not just the qualifications but the very constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama — the word “unorthodox” comes to mind. As does “shameful.” And yet, in these post-election times, especially considering the FEC’s decision not to audit Obama’s $600 million take during his campaign (at least $63 million of which was from undisclosed sources), this appears to be the new standard in post-election times.

Either way, Berg says that he is hopeful that the Court will “do the right thing,” and ensure that “the American public is provided with the opportunity to know that the person leading the United States of America is eligible, under our Constitution, to do so.”

As for New Jersey firebrand and attorney Leo Donofrio, his application for an emergency stay was denied by Justice Souter, Donofrio was able to refile and resubmit it to the Justice of his choosing, and properly did so. Today, the docket for his action shows that after being put before Justice Clarence Thomas, the application will be discussed by the Court in a December 5, 2008 conference.

Normally, during their term, the Supreme Court Justices conference on Wednesday (typically, but not always) and review the various petitions and applications before them, deciding which of the many such proceedings should be heard by the Court. I suspect that we could soon see a similar entry on the docket for Berg’s case as well.

Now, this does not mean that the Court has decided to hear either of these matters and, in fact, is fairly typical when it comes to the process. Still, for those hoping to have these cases heard on their merits, for those who feel these issues are more about the United States Constitution than Barack Obama, this is a step in the right direction.

Certainly, the proceedings moving along normally is positive with regard to publicity for Donofrio and Berg as well. Just yesterday, news of Alan Keyes’ suit in California reached the Drudge Report, so the questions surrounding this aspect of Obama’s candidacy are seemingly beginning to see the light of day.

ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports:

Florida Democratic Congressman Alcee Hastings pointed to Sarah Palin on Wednesday to rally Jews to Obama.

“If Sarah Palin isn’t enough of a reason for you to get over whatever your problem is with Barack Obama, then you damn well had better pay attention,” said Hastings. “Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks. So, you just think this through.”

Hastings, who is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, made his comments in Washington, D.C., while participating in a panel discussion sponsored by the National Jewish Democratic Council.

Asked what the congressman meant, Hastings spokesman David Goldenberg told ABC News that he was trying to argue that Palin is an “extremely conservative woman who is out of touch with mainstream America.”

After saying that Palin “don’t care too much” about Jews and blacks, Hastings argued that African Americans and Jews should come together behind Obama because there are many issues on which they agree.

“Just like Jews, blacks care about affordable health care, energy independence, and the separation of church and state,” said Hastings. “And just like blacks, Jews care about equal pay for equal work, investment in alternative energy, and a woman’s right to choose.”

Asked about the Hastings criticism, Palin spokeswoman Maria Comella said, “We’re taking a pass.”

The Florida GOP responded to Wednesday’s panel discussion by calling on Obama to repudiate Hastings.

“Unless Senator Obama and the Florida Democrat Party believes that ‘anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks,’ both Obama and the FDP should immediately refute this ridiculous and divisive statement.”

When contacted by ABC News on Thursday afternoon, the Obama campaign had no response to the Florida GOP.

Why does it matter if Obama slipped and mentioned his Muslim faith?

Why?  Because for a long time he has denied being Muslim.  For a long time he has claimed he was Christian.

This is quite a slip of the tongue.  I find it quite difficult that someone os his professed stature could make such a slip.  Slip up on many other issues, but your faith?  Or maybe it was not a slip?

Just last week the DNC and Obama were served with legal papers that stated that he was not a citizen.  The claim stated that we have no authoritative records to prove his citizenship, only his word.  His word?

How can we trust a man who “slips” when mentioning his faith?  How can we trust a man who has alegiances with known American born terrorists? How can we trust a man who claims he sat in church for 20 years and never heard his pastor make racist remarks or talk about how bad America is?  How can we trust a man who receives campaign contributions from Middle East terrorist nations, claims he sent the money back but they deny it?

How can we trust this man?

The reality is, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama is swindling America.  The Democrats have decided that thi sman of unknown origin is the new messiah.  In almost like a new cult, his followers flock around this man who can speak well, looks good in a suit and stands for change - but what change?  They are blinded by the theatrics, they are swayed by false truths and are leading America into disaster without knowing it.

The Democrats want the White House so badly, they would have nominated Satan himself if they could have - and maybe they have!

Check out The Toungue Slips!

Hear it for yoruself and then ask yourself if this is a “normal” slip of the tongue.

Think America - think hard!

Was Obama properly vetted by the DNC???

How can one so unqualified have so many skeletons and still be a nominee?

Why didn’t he tell us he was named Barry Soetoro?

Why has he forged documents by lying about other names, aliases?

Why has Barry hidden he was an Indonesian Citizen too?

Did he have an indonesian Passport?

Was it used in the early 80’s to travel to Pakistan?

Clearly, the seriousness of the charges require a full-blown debate in the mainstream media.

By the time election day rolls around Barry Soetoro will be a household name and McCain/Superwoman will save us from the iron grip of the Dems.

He may be a citizen but a LYING, TYPICAL POL, ANTI-AMERICAN citizen.

Change America does not need and will soundly reject.

In the past years I have always tried to make a donation to the American Heart Association, knowing the tremendous value it brings to the public.

This year I am going even further, I will be participating in the Walk for the American Heart Association and am asking YOU, the readers of this blog for your help - your donations.

PLEASE make a donation, make a difference - YOUR help IS needed and appreciated!

Please go to American Heart Association Walk and make a donation, now before you forget!

Please look in the center of the page where it says donation and let your heart fill in the amount.

Not only do I thank you, but the millions that are touched daily by this wonderful organization.

Thank you

I bought a bird feeder. I hung it on my back porch and filled it with seed. What a beauty of a bird feeder it is as I filled it lovingly with seed. Within a week we had hundreds of birds taking advantage of the continuous flow of free and easily accessible food.

But then the birds started building nests in the boards of the patio, above the table, and next to the barbecue.

Then came the poop. It was everywhere: on the patio tile, the chairs, the table…everywhere!

Then some of the birds turned mean. They would dive bomb me and try to peck me even though I had fed them out of my own pocket.

And others birds were boisterous and loud. They sat on the feeder and squawked and screamed at all hours of the day and night and demanded that I fill it when it got low on food.

After a while, I couldn’t even sit on my own back porch anymore. So I took down the bird feeder and in three days the birds were gone. I cleaned up their mess and took down the many nests they had built all over the patio.

Soon, the back yard was like it used to be…quiet, serene and no one demanding their rights to a free meal.

Now let’s see….. our government gives out free food, subsidized housing, free medical care, and free education and allows anyone born here to be an automatic citizen.

Then the illegals came by the tens of thousands.
Suddenly our taxes went up to pay for free services; small apartments are housing 5 families; you have to wait 6 hours to be seen by an emergency room doctor; your child’s 2nd grade class is behind other schools because over half the class doesn’t speak English.

Corn Flakes now come in a bilingual box; I have to “press one” to hear my bank talk to me in English, and people waving flags other than “Old Glory” are squawking and screaming in the streets, demanding more rights and free liberties.

Just my opinion, but maybe it’s time for the government to take down the bird feeder.. If you agree, pass it on; if not, continue cleaning up the poop!

CHECK THIS OUT ON SNOPES!!!!! IT ‘S TRUE!!!!!!

http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp

Read this to the end. Disgusting…

A conversation between a Customer and Bank of America

Bank: T his is the Bank of America, can I help you?

Customer: Yes, I want to cancel my account. I don’t want to do business
with you any longer.

Bank: Why?

Customer: You’re giving credit to illegal immigrants and I don’t think it’s
right. I’m taking my business elsewhere.

Bank: Well, Mr. Customer, we don’t want to see you do that, but we can’t
stop you. I’ll help you close the account. What is your account number?

Customer: (gives account number)

Bank: For security purposes and for your protection,can you please give me
the last four digits of your social security number?

Customer: No.

Bank: Mr. Customer, I need to verify your information, but in order to help
you, I’ll need verification of who you are.

Customer: Why should I give you my social security number? T he reason I’m
closing my account is that your bank is issuing credit cards to illegal
immigrants who don’t have social security numbers.

You are targeting that audience and want their business. Let’s say I’m an
illegal immigrant and you’ve given me a credit card. I have a question
about it and call for assistance. You wouldn’t be asking me for a Social
Security number, would you?

Bank: No sir, I wouldn’t.

Customer: Why not?

Bank: Because you would have pressed ‘2′ to speak in Spanish. We don’t ask
for that information when calling in on the Spanish line.

Democrat Corruption Thickens with Accusations against Senator Feinstein

Eagle Bridge, NY — May 15, 2007 — Senator Diane Feinstein served as the ranking Democrat on the Senate Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies sub-committee from 2001 to 2005. During that time, Feinstein directed more than $1.5 billion in federal contracts to two companies controlled by her husband. She resigned the position in 2005, after her husband sold his stake in the companies. The couple’s current net worth is estimated at between $45 and $100 million.

According to Metro Newspapers, Sen. Feinstein’s top legal advisor Michael Klein has admitted to informing the Senator as to which federal projects her husband’s companies had an interest. Mr. Klein is also Feinstein’s husband’s business partner. One of the companies in question saw its federal revenues rise from $44 million in 2000, before Feinstein joined the sub-committee, to $331 million by 2004. By 2006, after Feinstein had left the sub-committee, federal revenues for the company had declined to $152 million.

Bill Zachary, W Ketchup’s chairman, commented: “We’re still waiting for the Democrats to make good on their promise that this would be the most ethical Congress in history. But instead of an investigation, Feinstein received a position on the Senate Rules Committee, which is responsible for making sure Senators behave ethically.”

Although the mainstream media has ignored this story, Judicial Watch, a non-profit law firm dedicated to fighting government corruption, has opened an investigation.

W Ketchup’s CEO Dan Oliver noted: “The lobbying reform promised by Big Tuna Pelosi has stalled, a mere four months after the Democrats re-tasted the money and influence that power provides. While the country is better off having the Democrats on the golf course and away from Washington, we still believe that members of Congress who commit felonies should be in jail.”