U.S. Supreme Court Fires Warning Shot?

The United States Supreme Court fired the first warning shot over the bow of the U.S.S. Obama on January,7th 2009.
Although this was not a shot heard around the world, it should be. What am I talking about you ask? The controversy over whether President Elect Obama is a natural born citizen according to article II, section I of the United States Constitution. If you are unaware or haven’t heard there is a problem, blame the media. If you don’t know what the key issues are, then you are way behind the learning curve.

Let me get straight to the point, Dr. Orly Taitz filed suit with the U.S. Supreme Court, Lightfoot v. Bowen (www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a524.htm) on December,12th 2008. It was denied by Justice Kennedy and refiled with Chief Justice John Roberts. Chief Justice Roberts distributed it for conference and will be discussed January 23, 2008.

Why is this important?

There have been other cases filed with SCOTUS and three of them have been conferenced, then dismissed without comment, needless to say, IT IS NOT A NEW ISSUE before the court. The interesting thing about this is the Chief Justice himself has referred this case to be conferenced. I promise you, the Chief is not one who takes things lightly and when the Cheif speaks, everyone in the tribe better be listening.

As mentioned above this is not a new issue in front of the Court. To date the cases that have made it to conference by Leo Donofrio, Phillip Berg and Cort Wrotnowski have been dismissed by a legal term called standing or so it was assumed. Because the cases were dismissed without comment you are left to wonder the reason. However all of these cases are technically still alive. Phillip Berg has two scheduled for conference on January 9th and the 16th (www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm) The results for the one on the 9th were not in at the time of this post. The results should be available on Monday the 12th.

Here is how I view this situation.

I, like many others have been following this controversy since it started. Everyday it takes a new course and has so many twists and turns it becomes stranger everyday. I understand how people who voted for Obama think all of us have tin foil hats. Let me suggest that if this is how you feel, you must feel the same about some of the Justices of the Supreme Court. I believe the Supreme Court has been playing a game of chess and as any good chess player knows, the position and moves your opponent makes determines your strategy and movement. With the Chief Justice sending this case to be conferenced, I believe he is setting up his opponent to call, CHECK. We now know that Scalia, Thomas and Cheif Justice Roberts have recommended these cases for conference. If four of the nine justices believe this or any case has merit they can go to the next step and move to oral arguments.

Why is this my view?

It is no secret that President elect Obama has hired three law firms to defend these suits. The suits they are defending are based on his place of original birth or whether he had dual citizenship at birth. Obama has already answered the dual citizenship question on his own Fight the Smears website where he states his father( Obama Sr.) was a Kenyan and any children born to him at that time were governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 making Obama II a British National at the time of his birth, hence dual citizenship. The remaining question is, original place of birth. People who voted for President Elect Obama are quick to point out he was born in Hawaii and has a birth certficate to prove it. Again, if you haven’t been following this story you are behind the learning curve.

Allow me to share with you a court case that happened, Keyes v. Lingle back in early December. The case was dismissed on a technicality and not on content. However, the bigger story to this lawsuit is the fact that forensic document examiner, Sandra Ramsey Lines has documented in an affidavit the following. Keep in mind that Factcheck.org is an offshoot from the Annenberg Foundation and from 1995 the chairman of Annenberg Challenge was none else, but Mr. Barack Obama

Sandra Ramsey Lines :

I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.

Upon a cursory inspection of the internet COLB, one aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, “Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?” It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for oliterating it.

In my experience as a forensic document examiner, if an original of any document exists, that is the document that must be examined to obtain a definitive finding of genuineness or non-genuineness. In this case, examination of the vault birth certificate for President-Elect Obama would lay this issue to rest once and for all. [emphasis mine]

The importance of the the statement above is, the certificate posted online has the certificate number blacked out. At the bottom it clearly states that ANY ALTERATION INVALIDATES THIS CERTIFICATE. By blacking out this number he has created more questions than answers. The only question one needs to ask is why hire three law firms and spend untold amounts of money verses allowing the state of Hawaii to release the original vault certificate with the certification number. (SEE SPIFFIES COMMENT BELOW ON THIS ISSUE)

Lastly i would like to mention that some in the military are beginning to get involved. Phillip Berg, one of the attorneys mentioned above has now filed another case for a retired Colonel Gregory S. Hollister on December 30, 2008.
Dr. Orly Taitz has made reference she has another case ready to be filed on behalf of another group of military men and this letter was recently posted on her site: Drorly.blogspot.com

Lieutenant-Colonel Dr. David Earl- Graef

To All Americans,

This is not about sore losers, this is not about race. This about the
very foundations of our Nation. It is not about fear of change. I for one do not fear change but
only fear change that is not given the careful consideration our
founding fathers would have afforded it.

This is about America and the ability of our military to defend her and possibly much more. As a US military officer, I am just beginning myself to see the potential problems that may be
facing us. Before you discard any of this information please take the time to verify on OFFICIAL US Government sources such as the site for our United States Supreme Court.

FACT: Chief Justice John G. Roberts has agreed to hear Bowen vs
Lightfoot. A case challenging the constitutional qualifications of
Barak H. Obama aka Barry Soetoro to be POTUS. Check the court Docket.

http://orgin.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a524.htm

Comment- If the Chief Justice did not think we have a problem he would NOT distribute this case let alone give it to the full court to read. He does not want to look dumb or waste the time of the court after all he is the Chief.

FACT: Congress did not listen and hear this very loud signal he sent
to them yesterday but it rang a warning shot through many of the United States Armed Forces
more like a loud bomb. If I heard it, I KNOW the Joint Chiefs of the Military heard it.

Fact: Unfortunately you will have to take this as true on its
merits. But I assure you The Joint Chiefs as military officers take the
constitution very seriously.

FACT: If only ONE of the Joint Chiefs of Staff balks we lose an
entire arm of our military ! He can not nor will not give the order
to mobilize the forces if he has a reason to question the validity of that order. In
fact he himself is duty bound to not obey this if not given by a “legal” President or at a minimum is conflicted as to the right thing to do !! The Oath states he will obey the lawful orders of those above him not ANY order. Chief Justice Roberts has as much as told them by distributing this case we may have a constitutional problem with Obama. So at this very moment our Military leaders are likely conflicted. Not a good thing.

*****The words of JOE BIDEN. He warned of an international crisis
soon and implied it would be of immense proportion soon after Obama took office may . ****** Have you
already forgotten ????? Have you been distract by the economy. Did Biden know something ??? Has anybody bothered to ask him??

And he thinks Barak can handle it. Do you ??? Let Obam face down Putin without the Navy or maybe the
Air Force or maybe the Army or mayybe ALL of them to back him up. I suppose some of you out there
still believe in a Superman. Reality check. He was a comic book
character and Obama is not a Superman like some of you believe. He is not the messiah otherwise he would not be giving us doom and gloom for the economy. He would waive his hand and fix it. Please wake
up !!

We are not asking Obama for the moon only that he give us some
additional information to assure us he is who he says he is AND qualify under the Constitution and we in the military will do whatever he asks us to do to protect this country. This is what we do.

This is reasonable and prudent but Obama is refusing and fighting this with
everything and I mean everything in his power.

To my Fellow Officers and Enlisted who are required to lay their lives at the very feet of Liberty.

Do not despair but take good faith. Remember those who came before. He is not our President yet so you still have a right to raise concerns all the way to the Pentagon. Let the Officers in your command know that Justice Roberts has taken the first stand to insure the Constitution is followed. Let our Chief Justice know you support him and appreciate him for HIS courage valor to stand up for us. Call/ write your congressman. Pass this letter to every blog you can. Ask your family to do the same we are a mighty voice and it can be heard.

From: Newsvine.com

Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit seeking to remove John McCain from the California ballot because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled late Tuesday that the law at the time of McCain’s birth automatically granted citizenship to offspring of U.S. citizens.

McCain’s parents were both citizens when McCain was born Aug. 29, 1936, in the Panama Canal Zone, a U.S. territory where his father was stationed with the U.S. Navy.

Alsup said Congress passed a law the following year specifically to “remove any doubt as to persons in Sen. McCain’s circumstances in the Canal Zone,” thus “retroactively rendering Sen. McCain a natural born citizen, if he was not one already.”

The Constitution requires that only “natural born” citizens hold the presidency, a term on which the Founding Fathers did not elaborate.

The judge also said the plaintiff, Markham Robinson, chairman of the American Independent Party, had no standing to file the lawsuit because he is not a candidate for president.

McCain said last February that the issue was put to rest 44 years ago when Republican Barry Goldwater sought the presidency. Goldwater was born in Arizona when it was a territory.

Now if we can only get the courts to look into the Obama citizenship charges – but will they?

If Obama wins and is later removed because he is not a citizen, then Biden will become president.

Nancy Pelosi will then become VP…

Hillary would then be set up to be speaker of the house!

Look out USA!!!!

Think America – think hard!