“WE NOTICED”

admin on December 23rd, 2009

This was written by Sherry Hackett, Buddy Hackett’s widow……..

 

“WE NOTICED”

President Obama:

Today I read of your administration ‘ s plan to re-define September 11 th as a National Service Day.

Sir, it’s time we had a talk………

During your campaign, Americans watched as you made mockery of our tradition of standing and crossing your heart when the Pledge of Allegiance was spoken.   You, out of four people on the stage, were the only one not honoring our tradition.

YES, “We noticed.”

During one of your many speeches, Americans heard you say you intended to visit all 57 states.

We all know that Islam, not America , has 57 states.

YES, “We noticed.”

When President Bush leaned over at Ground Zero and gently placed a flower on the memorial, while you nonchalantly tossed your flower onto the pile without leaning over.

YES, “We noticed.”

Every time you apologized to other countries for America ’s position on an issue we have wondered why you don’t share our pride in this great country.   When you have heard foreign leaders berate our country and our beliefs, you have not defended us .   In fact, you insulted the British Crown beyond belief.

YES, “We noticed.”

When your pastor of 20 years, “God-damned America , ” and said that 9/11 was ” America ’s chickens coming home to roost , “ and you denied having heard recriminations of that nature, we wondered how that could be.   You later disassociated yourself  from that church and Pastor Wright because it was politically expedient to do so.  (Since the inauguration, Jeremiah Wright has been your guest at the White House at least six times.)

YES, “We noticed.”

When you announced that you would transform America , we wondered why.  With all her faults, America is the greatest country on earth.   Sir, KEEP THIS IN MIND, “if not for America and the people who built her, you wouldn’t be sitting in the White House now.”   Prior to your election to the highest office in this Country, you were a senator from Illinois and from what we can glean from the records available, not a very remarkable one.

YES, “We noticed.”

All through your campaign and even now, you have surrounded yourself with individuals who are basically unqualified for the positions for which you appointed them.   Worse than that, the majority of them are people who, like you, bear no special allegiance, respect, or affection for this country and her traditions

YES, “We noticed.”

You are 9 months into your term and every morning millions of Americans wake up to a new horror heaped on us by you.  You seek to saddle working Americans with a health care / insurance ”reform” package that, along with cap and trade, will bankrupt this nation.

YES, “We noticed.”

We seek, by protesting, to let our representatives know that we are not in favor of these crippling expenditures and we are labeled “un-American”, “racist”, “mob . ”   We wonder how we are supposed to let you know how frustrated we are.   You have attempted to make our protests seem isolated and insignificant.   Until your inauguration, Americans always had the right to speak out.

YES, “We noticed.”

On September 11, 2001 there were no Republicans or Democrats, only Americans.   And we all grieved together and helped each other in whatever way we could.   The attack on 9/11 was carried out because we are Americans.

And YES, “We noticed.”

There were many of us who prayed that as a black president you could help unite this nation.  In six months you have done more to destroy this nation than the attack on 9/11.   You have failed us.

YES, “We noticed.”

September 11 th is a day of remembrance for all Americans.   You propose to make 9/11 a “National Service Day . ”  While we know that you don’t share our reverence for 9/11, we pray that history will report your proposal as what it is … a disgrace.

YES, “We noticed.”

You have made a mockery of our Constitution and the office that you hold.   You have embarrassed and slighted us in foreign visits and policy.

YES, “We noticed.”

We have noticed all these things.   We will deal with you.   When Americans come together again, it will be to remove you from office.

Take notice.

Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed

This whole thing is getting more and more farcical with each passing day. Her story is changing so often and so much that even Jessica Fletcher would have difficulty sorting things out.

As it stands, the only consistent factors are ignorance, arrogance, audacity and stupidity. Truth, competence, credibility and principles are nowhere to be seen.

Now, in the latest incarnation of her version of the truth about detainee treatment and enhanced interrogations, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is claiming that the CIA deliberately misled her and other members of Congress with regard to techniques used to gather intelligence.

I’m going to go out on a limb and say that, politically, Nancy Pelosi does not survive this whole debacle. Barack Obama doesn’t need this drain on political capital with health care and other debates looming and, that being said, the White House has an enormous amount to gain by replacing her as House Speaker with Steny Hoyer who, by all accounts, is a bosom buddy of Rahm Emanuel and would essentially relinquish control of Congress to the Obama administration.

If the administration is indeed pulling the strings in order to facilitate Hoyer’s control of the House, knowing full well the Oval Office’s obvious control over the press, I think it’s only a matter of time before Pelosi is forced to step aside as speaker. Hoyer has already pushed for the entire matter to be investigated, and Pelosi certainly isn’t doing herself any favors by sounding like the botoxed equivalent of Bill Clinton with his pants down.

Look for the press to get increasingly aggressive with her – on behalf of the White House. Look for the press to doggedly pursue the minutes of the briefings involving enhanced interrogation techniques, and look for release of information that would not normally have been released, especially now that President Obama has had some undoubtedly superficial come-to-Jesus moment with regard to detainees, interrogation and national security.

Grab the stuffing and sweet potatoes. Pelosi’s turkey is done. The White House is hungry for power, and the press holds the carving knife.

Dear Member of the U.S. Congress;

On January 8th, 2009, you will be meeting in a joint session of Congress in order to perform the final step of COUNTING and CONFIRMING the electoral votes for the President of the United States (POTUS).

This urgent letter is a request by your (and Mr. Obama’s) employers, We The People, for you to submit an OBJECTION to those votes being counted due to the Constitutional INELIGIBILITY of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. to serve as POTUS:

1. No proof that he was born on U.S. sovereign territory, as required by Article II of the U.S. Constitution (the posting of his forged & fraudulent Certification of Live Birth (C.O.L.B.) only proves fraud – and that he’s INELIGIBLE;

2. No proof that he ever applied for U.S. citizenship, when reaching the age of majority, following his years as a citizen of Indonesia (this would make him ‘naturalized’, and therefore INELIGIBLE);

3. No proof that he was born of two parents of U.S. citizenship, with both owing allegiance to and being under the jurisdiction of the U.S., as required by law and/or the Constitution, in order to be a ‘natural-born citizen’. (actually he has freely admitted the opposite to be true, and therefore INELIGIBLE);

4. No proof that he was authorized, as a ‘natural-born U.S. citizen’ with a U.S. Passport, to travel to Pakistan in 1981 (he could not by law), or that he re-applied for ‘naturalized’ U.S. citizenship on his return, which would also make him INELIGIBLE;

5. No certified proof that he registered for the draft/Selective Service between the ages of 18 and 26, as required by law, thereby rendering him ineligible, by law, for employment in the Executive Branch of our government, and therefore INELIGIBLE for POTUS. (NOTE: over a year of multiple FOIA requests produced a forged and blatantly fraudulent Selective Service Registration form that should be cause for indictments and arrests);

6. No proof that he is, in fact, not an illegal alien, and therefore subject to the same penalties that would befall all illegal aliens in his situation. Therefore, INELIGIBLE;

Constructive Knowledge would inform and confirm to all who have examined the facts of this collossal fraud being perpetrated upon We The People of America (see www.DrOrly.Blogspot.com – ‘Open Letter to C.J. Roberts’) that confirming the electoral votes and thereby furthering the act of installing Mr. Obama as POTUS could possibly be construed as failure to honor one’s oath of office.

Therefore, we are calling on you, as a member of Congress, sworn to uphold, protect, and defend that Constitution, to OBJECT to the counting and confirmation of those electoral votes until proof of his eligibility or ineligibility can be determined, and to call for indictments in regard to any and all alleged violations of U.S. laws and one’s sworn oath.

Please let us know if you intend to stand with We The People in this epic battle to defend and preserve our Constitution. Our Nation can survive four years of any President. It cannot survive without a Constitution.

Sincerely;

We The People of the United States of America

Obama – the illegal immigrant?

admin on September 5th, 2008

Obama, DNC Served Yesterday Afternoon

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama was served with papers yesterday connected with the lawsuit filed more than two weeks ago in federal court in Philadelphia questioning his constitutional eligibility for the American presidency. Service was made at his Washington, D.C. Senate office at approximately 1:00 p.m.

From a press release provided by filing attorney Philip Berg and available on his Web site:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States, has received confirmation from his Process Service Company that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Senator Barack Obama were served today, September 4, 2008, with the legal documents pertaining to Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083. The DNC was served at 12:00 p.m. and Senator Obama was served at 1:00 p.m. The U.S. Attorney’s Office accepted service on behalf of the Federal Elections Committee (FEC) on or about August 22, 2008.

A telephone call to Obama’s Senate office in Washington, D.C. yielded no official comment, as his staffer maintained that she was “not familiar with any legal action” and, even though I mentioned that service was made in D.C. to that office, it was “probably a campaign-related issue.”

The subsequent call to the senator’s campaign headquarters, however, yielded the same result but in a more entertaining fashion.

“That’s very interesting,” said a campaign official who declined to provide a name and admitted that this was the first he had heard of Berg’s lawsuit. He asked whether anything about the civil action had appeared in the newspapers, and when told that the story had appeared in the Washington Times, he laughed.

“Has the story appeared in the New York Times? How about the Washington Post? Or the Los Angeles Times? The Chicago Tribune?” he asked. “Those are all more trustworthy papers than the Washington Times. When the story appears there, then we might have something to say about it.”

“If Sen. Obama were ineligible to run for president,” he said, “I think we would have heard about it by now.”

Berg, over the phone, mentioned that he has received phone calls and advice from dozens of lawyers across the country, and was currently working on preparing a motion for expedited discovery to be filed before the next conference with Judge Surrick. While he was unable to provide a copy of the affidavit of service–as soon as I get a copy, it will be posted here–he was more than happy to offer his perspective on the predictable response I received from Obama’s senate office and campaign headquarters.

“They know about it,” he said, noting that the story has catapulted across the Internet and radiowaves, citing 7.9 million hits on his Web site and mentioning that he is booked for a pair of radio interviews this evening, and will be sitting with a newspaper photographer for another story to appear in the [Norristown, PA] Times-Herald. “Too many times, a lawsuit can be filed and nobody knows about it. This time, the political people must know for sure.”

“The silence is proving me right,” he said, wondering why no doctor or nurse has come forward to claim the inevitable publicity which would accompany an admission that they were in attendance for the Illinois senator’s birth. “I think it’s an insult to the American public and even more so to his campaign supporters who have worked so hard and donated so much money. All they’re doing is prolonging the agony. If I’m right and they stay quiet, they could sit on it for 60 days, get elected, and the only way out would be impeachment by this do-nothing Congress.”

“What does that do for America?” He asked. “This deserves a comment one way or another.”